Bio-Informational Graphic-Imaging Modeling
Verka Nikolova, MSc (mathematics)
2009, Troyan, Bulgaria
http://www.medicalbiophysics.dir.bg/en/mountain_water.html
Bio-modeling can help in the activities of the physician. The right diagnosis means also finding the correct path of therapy for the illness. That is why, from the very onset of the manifestation of my bio-sensitive abilities, I focused my attention on getting the correct diagnosis. I began to, “involuntarily”, draw the organs of the body and add, in a specific way, the changes in them (fig. 1).
Fig. 1 Involuntary diagnose drawing
on 10.28.1994
Simultaneously, in my mind, I would get explicit information regarding the reason for the ailment. For example, “the cause-agent is stick-shaped” (information in cases of tuberculosis). I started seeing the very disease in form, type, color, size, etc. Sometimes, for a clearer picture, I would draw the pathology of the illness or I’d call up its impression on the skin, i.e. I pull up a “scanner image”. Those cases are listed in the book “Clairvoyance”, by the Dr. Ignat Ignatov , published by “Perseus” publishing house, Bulgaria, year 2008, pg 48-150., Those cases are listed also in the book “Clairvoyance” in Germany, published by “Argo Verlag” publishing house These cases were personally observed by Dr. Silvia Moeva, at the Second Policlinics in Lovech city, in 1992. For example, in cases of dermatological diseases, I would draw a picture of the epidermis cells and the way the disease is spreading on. The plaques in the case of psoriasis are formed through web-shaped inclusions of the neighboring cells. This way, I determine the type-classic, geographic, etc. If the patient has anemia, I would draw the blood in the shape of waves and I’d also determine either which elements have parameters lower than normal or the pollutants (fig.1). After that, I receive applicable information about the way how to eliminate the reason of the disease. Should phyto-therapy is to be used, I get the exact prescription for the herbal combination with the precise quantities and instructions for preparation. Most of the unique phyto-therapeutic prescriptions which I have received in this bio-informational way, are published in my book “Herbal revelations- inspired by the Miracle-man from Rila Mountain”, Published by VIA, Sofia, Bulgaria, year 2003.
My given abilities allow me to practically enter all the way through and to every level the body functions on – even in the intra-cellular space, on cellular level, molecular level, and so on.
Fig. 2 Anatomical outline on which the diseases
are being involuntarily sketched on 21.03.2000
After using this method for two years, I decided that I was wasting too much time. So, I then sketched a special scheme of the human body. I began using it every time I would be diagnosing a person, and on it, with a color pen, I started pinpointing the places where the disease manifested. At that time, I’d write down the name of it (fig.2). This scheme is cited by Dr. Iliyana Yaneva- Balabanska, MD, in her book “Untraditional methodics of diagnostics and treatment in Bulgaria”, Sofia 2006, pg 264 (Attachment #10 in the book). In the same book, the author also gives examples of cases based on her personal observations, and she notes: “Vera diagnosed S. Nikolova by her method of “involuntary” drawing. She pointed out a lot more diseases than those already marked in the personal ambulatory file of the patient.”
By using my method, I can establish a diagnosis in several different ways:
- In the presence of the person;
- While talking with the patient or a patient’s relative,
- By the picture of the patient,
- In the absence of the patient but in the presence of somebody who knows him/her.
The only important thing that I need to know is the full name and date of birth. The rest is being “captured” by my hand in the form of signals and is being placed on the exact spot on the anatomic scheme, regardless of the distance between me and person.
In 1993, my diagnostic methodic was directly observed by a group of physicians at Second Policlinics in Lovech city, chaired by Dr. Silvia Moeva. Further on, the research of this methodic continued under the direct supervision of Dr. Stephan Chikakchiev, in 1994 – 1995. He concluded that during this span of time, I was absolutely accurate in my diagnosis in 142 cases, out of 163 diagnosed patients, i.e. with 87% accuracy. The results are classified by groups of diseases, and to a further detail, by types.
Bio-modeling Results by Disease Groups
| Diseases by System | # of patients seen | # of pаtients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Muscle-Skeleton System | 15 | 12 | 80 |
| 2. Vascular system | 38 | 29 | 76 |
| 3. Respiratory system | 27 | 25 | 93 |
| 4. Digestive system | 23 | 20 | 87 |
| 5. Urinary and sex system | 10 | 9 | 90 |
| 6. Female Reproductive system | 9 | 9 | 100 |
| 7. Nerves system | 23 | 22 | 96 |
| 8. Endocrine system | 7 | 6 | 86 |
| 9. Skin | 5 | 5 | 100 |
| 10. Sense organs | 4 | 3 | 75 |
| 11. Immune system | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 163 | 142 | 87 % + 1, - 1 % |
The table shows that I have achieved highest accuracy with the female reproductory system, skin and immune system- 100% accuracy. Then come ailments of the neuro system- 96%, respiratory system -93% urinary system - 90% and so on. And acuracy is at its lowest point with diseases of the organs of the senses - 75%.
Results of Bio-modeling by Type of Disease
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Rheumatoid arthritis | 3 | 2 | 67 |
| 2. Rheumatism | 3 | 3 | 100 |
| 3. Tendons' inflammation | 3 | 2 | 67 |
| 4. Arthroses | 6 | 5 | 83 |
| 15 | 12 | 80 % + 1, - 1 % |
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. High Blood Pressure | 15 | 13 | 87 |
| 2. Low Blood Pressure | 8 | 6 | 75 |
| 3. Varicosis | 6 | 4 | 67 |
| 4. Arythmia | 5 | 3 | 60 |
| 5. Ischemic disease | 3 | 2 | 67 |
| 6. Heart insufficiency | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| 38 | 29 | 76 % + 1, - 1 % |
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Catching a cold | 9 | 9 | 100 |
| 2. Rynitis, tonsillitis, pharyngitis, laryngitis | 3 | 3 | 100 |
| 3. Sinuitis | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 4. Bronchitis | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 5. Pneumonia | 5 | 4 | 80 |
| 6. Bronho-asthmatic disease | 3 | 2 | 67 |
| 7. Tuberuclosis | 3 | 3 | 100 |
| 27 | 25 | 93 % + 1, - 1 % |
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Teeth diseases | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 2. Gastritis | 5 | 4 | 80 |
| 3. Ulcer of the stomach | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 4. Ulcer of the pilor | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 5. Collitis | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 6. Hemorrhoids | 3 | 2 | 67 |
| 7. Pancreatitis | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 8. Gallbladder and Gallbladder Tract | 3 | 2 | 67 |
| 9 Liver | 2 | 2 | 87 |
| 23 | 20 | 93 % + 1, - 1 % |
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Kidney diseases(pyelitis? Pielonephritis? Glomerulonephritis?) | 5 | 4 | 80 |
| 2. Kidney stones | 3 | 3 | 100 |
| 3. Prostatic gland problems | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 10 | 9 | 90 % + 1, - 1 % |
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Cysts of the ovari | 3 | 3 | 100 |
| 2. Sterility | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| 3. Benign cancer? Of the uterus and the breast-feeding gland | 5 | 5 | 100 |
| 9 | 9 | 100 % + 1, - 1 % |
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.Headach and migrane | 3 | 3 | 100 |
| 2. Neuroses, including heart neurosis | 8 | 7 | 88 |
| 3. Neuralgies | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 4. Lumbago | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 5. Herniated discs | 8 | 8 | 100 |
| 23 | 22 | 96 % + 1, - 1 % |
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Diabetes | 3 | 2 | 67 |
| 2. Gout | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 3. Thyroid diseases | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 7 | 6 | 86 % + 1, - 1 % |
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Psoriasis | 3 | 3 | 100 |
| 2. Skin tuberculosis | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| 3. Keratosis | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| 5 | 5 | 100 % + 1, - 1 % |
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Kataract | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| 2. Glaukoma | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| 3. Defness | 2 | 1 | 50 |
| 4 | 3 | 75 % + 1, - 1 % |
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Allergy | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 2 | 2 | 100 % + 1, - 1 % |
The tables above show which diseases are most accurately bio-modeled with the bio-informational graphic-image methodic.
Five years later, I improved the anatomic scheme which opened up a possibility for even grater accuracy of the diagnosing.
In 2005, under the supervision of Dr. Petya Nikolova, from Plovdiv city, the methodic that I was practicing was put on another test. The results of the application of my diagnosing were compared with the results from experts councils and with the personal ambulatory files of the patients who came to be examined. Dr.Nikolova commented on this:” Verka Nikolova diagnosed 53 patients and in 51 of the cases she was accurate, which is 96%accuracy.”
| Disease type | # of patients seen | # of patients seen diagnosed correctly | Accuracy of the diagnoses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Muscle-Skeleton System | 6 | 5 | 83 |
| 2. Heart-Vascular system | 10 | 9 | 90 |
| 3. Digestive system | 7 | 7 | 100 |
| 4. Nerves system | 27 | 27 | 100 |
| 5. Organs of the Senses | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| 6. Immune system | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 53 | 51 | 96 % + 1, - 1 % |
Nominated by Dr. Ignatov Dr.
Nikolova is Holder of Koch’s
Medal 2008 for author methodic
Dr. Tyminskiy, Prof. Vlassov, Nikolova,
Hanover, 2009
With the time passing by, I not only further improved the methodic, but my bio-sensitivity got better, too. Every organ in my body started responding in correlation with the organ in the body of the patient whom I was in the process of diagnosing with the anatomic scheme in front of me. I started feeling the pain, seeing and understanding the reason for it. All this helped me to more boldly express my position when diagnosing. Besides all this, it turned out to be of extreme importance to have worked with physicians from all specialties. Based on mutual respect and honoring the knowledge of everyone in his/her area, as well as honoring my abilities, we could find the most appropriate therapy for a patient’s particular disease.
My many years of teamwork with different physicians, each of them a specialist in her/his fields, confirmed that my personally developed method of “BIOINFORMATIONAL GRAPHIC-IMAGING MODELING” can be successfully applied in the cases of:
- secondary prevention of diseases;
- early diagnosis, when the official medicine cannot/is not able to detect the starting ailment;
- diagnosing a started pathological process;
- diagnosing hereditary inclination to different diseases;
- diagnosing diseases which cause is yet not quite clearly specified /established by the standard medicine;
- diagnosing energy fields(ruptures, displacement of fields, etc.);
- notions not accepted by the standard medicine, but which cause discomfort and (trigger), different pathological processes;
- determine the condition of the energy meridians (formulated/expressed in/used by the Chinese medicine) as well as the places with blocked energy in there- which is also a cause for ailments and diseases;
- determine the energy condition of the chakras.
Anne-Marie Risbjerg, Manuela Friebe, Monika Stamm,
Gertrud Kohl, Isabella Petri, Helga Drechsel,
Edith Günther, Angela Zellner, Dr. Ignat Ignatov,
Verka Nikolova, Gerda Hilda Lämmler, Diana Schultheis,
Milena Kardaleva (translator)
Reiki Master Project, Teteven, Bulgaria, 2009,
Bobevski’s House (Nikolovi’s family house, since 1852)
http://www.isabellapetri.de/Biophysical%20Experimentsb.html
In the opinion of Dr. Iliana Yaneva-Balabanska, MD, Dr. Silvia Moeva, Dr. Stephan Chikakchiev, Dr. Petya Nikolova, Dr. Maria Kutzarova, Dr.Dobrev, Dr. Plamen Vanev, and other physicians that I have worked with, as well as in the opinion of Dr. Ignat Ignatov, my BIOINFORMATIONAL GRAPHIC-IMAGING MODELING can be used as a non-conventional methodic together with the established by the official medicine approaches for both diagnosing and early intervention of different diseases.
The report and methodic of Verka Nikolova © are copyrighted.
The report has been presented at the International Medical Congress EUROMEDICA,
European Academy of Natural Sciences, Hanover, 2009.